Analyze any video with AI. Uncover insights, transcripts, and more in seconds. (Get started for free)
7 Surprising Factors Influencing GDP PPP Per Capita Rankings in 2024
7 Surprising Factors Influencing GDP PPP Per Capita Rankings in 2024 - Technological Advancements Boost Small Nations' Productivity
The rise of technology is proving pivotal in boosting productivity within smaller nations, impacting their GDP PPP per capita rankings in a significant way. These countries are leveraging technological advancements to improve their overall productivity. Notably, studies indicate a strong link between technological innovation and productivity, suggesting a 1% rise in technological innovation can lead to a 1.19% increase in overall output.
Small nations are actively pursuing policies designed to encourage competition and improve access to financing and technology. This focus not only helps improve economic performance but also shows that these nations are better able to handle global economic shifts. While larger, more developed countries struggle with productivity slowdowns, these smaller nations are showing a pathway forward – demonstrating the potential for effective technology integration to spark economic progress and prosperity. Furthermore, using technology to improve agriculture is essential for keeping up with increasing food demands. This exemplifies the broader point that embracing technological innovation plays a crucial role in generating national wealth.
Smaller nations are demonstrating a remarkable ability to harness technological advancements to propel productivity growth, often surpassing expectations. This is evident in their swift adoption of technologies like AI and blockchain to optimize operations and enhance transparency, bypassing the bureaucratic complexities often encountered in larger economies.
The concentrated nature of smaller populations allows for rapid dissemination of digital literacy through focused educational programs, fostering a tech-savvy workforce readily adaptable to new tools. This widespread adoption translates to significant efficiency gains across diverse sectors.
Furthermore, the rise of remote work has created a unique opportunity for small nations to participate in the global economy without needing significant physical infrastructure. This flexibility not only reduces operational costs but also enables them to attract a global pool of talent, further fueling economic expansion.
Small nations frequently act as testing grounds for novel technological applications, including the use of drones in agricultural monitoring. These initial projects can yield immediate productivity improvements and, if successful, can be scaled to wider use. However, this rapid implementation also can reveal unforeseen challenges and consequences that may be costly to correct later.
Streamlining bureaucracy through e-governance initiatives has been successful in several smaller countries, enhancing operational efficiency for businesses and potentially attracting increased foreign investment. However, the success of this depends on having a government that is transparent, responsive and that works well with all its citizen.
Broadband internet penetration tends to be more consistent in smaller nations, facilitating the rapid assimilation of new technologies. This readily available and reliable connectivity improves communication, fosters knowledge sharing, and underpins productivity gains across various economic areas. However, in some cases, this increased access and ease of information has shown to lead to increased social pressures.
A focus on automation in manufacturing and service industries has enabled many small nations to boost production, enabling them to compete effectively on both price and quality with larger economies. This deliberate technological investment underscores a strategy of leveraging technology for economic advancement.
Small nations often demonstrate a remarkable aptitude for fostering collaborative ecosystems between government, academia, and industry. This synergistic partnership enables rapid technological advancements and translates to improved productivity across the board. These partnerships are particularly good for long-term economic progress, but they can also lead to higher degrees of risk aversion as everyone is invested in protecting the benefits that came out of those collaborative efforts.
Data analytics is becoming a key component in the economic strategies of several small nations, allowing them to pinpoint specific sectors with the potential for global leadership. This data-driven approach to resource allocation effectively optimizes economic growth and impacts GDP PPP per capita improvements. Although, this can also lead to overlooking areas with potential that are not highlighted in the data.
Finally, the adoption of digital payment systems has fostered a more inclusive and dynamic environment for entrepreneurship and small businesses. Lowering the barriers to economic participation expands the pool of contributors, thereby fostering greater productivity across the economy. While this is positive for economic inclusion, it also raises concerns related to financial security.
7 Surprising Factors Influencing GDP PPP Per Capita Rankings in 2024 - Climate Change Impacts Agricultural Output and Economic Growth
Climate change is increasingly impacting agricultural production, a factor that significantly influences economic growth and, subsequently, GDP PPP per capita rankings. The projected decline in global agricultural yields by 2050, estimated at 17%, highlights the severity of the issue. While the global agricultural output hasn't yet shown a drastic slowdown, the combined pressure of climate shifts and growing global food demands, along with dietary changes, could create considerable future problems.
Some regions are already beginning to see potential economic impacts. The EU anticipates potential GDP reductions of 0.7% to 1.0% from the impacts of climate change on agricultural production by the 2080s, with similar concerns for the US. Estimates in the US show a possible GDP impact between 0.9% and 1.5% due to climate change impacts between 2080 and 2099, depending on various models used. These estimates show the potential for considerable damage.
Interestingly, even with these potential negative impacts, the overall growth rate of global agricultural output hasn't yet fully reflected the effects of climate change. However, the future may look different. To effectively manage these challenges and support long-term economic health, the development and use of climate-smart agricultural practices are crucial. This is especially important as agriculture is threatened by a wide range of climate impacts from shifting weather patterns, changes in ecosystems, and the pressures on water resources.
In essence, the intersection of climate change and agricultural practices presents complex and evolving challenges to economic prosperity and global GDP per capita rankings. Understanding how climate change will reshape agricultural output and impact the economy will be crucial as we move forward in the coming years.
The projected impacts of climate change on agricultural output are significant and potentially disruptive to economic growth. Estimates suggest that global agricultural productivity could decrease by 5% to 30% by 2100, varying based on regional climate changes. These shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns are disrupting established agricultural practices, leading to a decline in traditional farming methods' effectiveness. The financial ramifications of climate change on agriculture are potentially enormous. The annual cost to the global economy could be as high as $1.5 trillion by 2050, with developing countries, whose economies heavily depend on agriculture, being disproportionately affected. These economic disruptions could have a substantial impact on GDP rankings.
Certain crops, notably wheat and maize, are particularly vulnerable to temperature increases. Even relatively small temperature changes can lead to substantial yield decreases, which directly translates to reduced economic productivity. Furthermore, the growing unpredictability of weather patterns due to climate change is causing greater fluctuations in commodity prices, creating economic instability. This volatility makes it difficult for farmers to effectively plan their production schedules and long-term investment strategies. A recent study highlighted that a 1°C increase in global temperatures could reduce rice yields by as much as 10%, a major concern for food security and economic stability in nations heavily dependent on rice production.
Beyond temperature changes, increased rainfall in certain regions is leading to frequent floods, which damage not only crops but also critical infrastructure. These flood-related disruptions seriously hinder economic growth. Interestingly, the effects of climate change are not uniformly distributed. Some regions may experience extended growing seasons and, consequently, increased agricultural productivity. However, other regions face significant decreases in yields, creating disparities in agricultural output and economic growth that could exacerbate global inequalities.
Without proactive adaptation strategies, developing nations could face up to a 25% decline in agricultural output by 2050. Their agricultural sectors are less resilient to climate-related challenges, potentially straining their economies. Climate shifts are also altering the prevalence and spread of pests and diseases, further increasing crop losses and reducing yields. These shifts contribute to reduced agricultural productivity and, in turn, slow economic growth. The costs of adapting to climate change within agriculture, such as developing and implementing drought-resistant crop varieties and investing in irrigation technologies, can place a substantial burden on local economies. These costs could necessitate reallocation of funds away from other crucial infrastructure projects essential for economic growth, presenting further challenges in balancing development and climate adaptation. While it's clear that historically, agricultural research has driven productivity gains, the quantifiable impact of human-induced climate change on that productivity growth requires more comprehensive assessment.
7 Surprising Factors Influencing GDP PPP Per Capita Rankings in 2024 - Shift in Global Supply Chains Reshapes Economic Landscape
The way goods are moved and made around the world is changing significantly, driven by the pandemic's disruptions. Businesses are increasingly bringing production back to their own countries or focusing on regional supply networks to protect themselves from future problems. This shift is also leading to a rise in local manufacturing capabilities. A key aspect of this change is companies seeking out multiple sources for their supplies to reduce risks from relying too heavily on any one region, especially with recent global tensions. While China remains a significant player in global manufacturing, its dominance is being challenged by these new dynamics. The interaction of technology improvements, evolving consumer demands, and geopolitical issues all combine to make the current global supply chain a complex system. These changes will probably have unanticipated effects on how countries are ranked based on their per-person economic output, and could also lead to new social and economic hurdles or chances around the world.
The pandemic acted as a catalyst, accelerating shifts in how goods are produced and moved globally. There's a growing push towards balancing efficiency with resilience in supply chains, a move away from solely focusing on the cheapest production location to considering risks and stability. This is leading to a kind of "re-localization" of industries, with companies looking to produce closer to their customers or within their own region. We're seeing a shift towards regional manufacturing hubs, and places like Vietnam and India are taking on a larger role in global production.
Businesses are becoming more cautious and are diversifying where they get their supplies to reduce their exposure to disruptions. It's no longer just about getting the lowest price; companies are weighing that against the risk of relying on a single supplier. Surveys show a strong trend towards moving away from single-country sourcing, a substantial change from the past.
One of the big changes is how digital tools are reshaping supply chain management. We're seeing increasing use of artificial intelligence and machine learning, which has the potential to significantly reduce operational costs, particularly in logistics. These technologies can improve inventory management and predict demand, which makes operations smoother and potentially more efficient.
There's also a growing trend of companies moving manufacturing back to their home countries – a concept called "reshoring". This is driven by rising labor costs in other countries and geopolitical uncertainty. We can expect to see how this reshaping of production affects the GDP of countries that were previously major manufacturing centers.
The increased need for warehousing to handle supply chain disruptions has led to a boom in investment in logistics real estate. Some projections estimate that the demand for industrial space could increase dramatically in the coming years. This demonstrates the ripple effects of these supply chain shifts in unexpected areas.
The global trade landscape is changing as well. We're seeing a movement towards trade agreements that are focused on regional partnerships instead of global ones. This is a reflection of countries prioritizing economic connections within their regions, a strategy aimed at strengthening supply chain security and potentially redefining trade routes.
The semiconductor industry serves as a great example of how these changes are impacting specific areas. Because there are a few key companies that supply chips, recent increases in demand have highlighted vulnerabilities in the global supply chain. This has spurred countries to invest in building their own chip production capabilities, fundamentally altering the tech manufacturing landscape.
The growth of online shopping has had a large impact on consumer behavior, leading to the need for stronger "last-mile" logistics solutions. Companies are investing heavily in local distribution centers to get goods to customers faster and more efficiently, which is changing the logistics and transportation industries.
These changes in supply chains are affecting labor markets as well. While some sectors are facing labor shortages, new opportunities are arising in areas like logistics and technology-related roles, shifting the demand for specific skillsets and influencing local economies.
While regionalizing supply chains has some advantages, it also presents new challenges. Companies have to navigate more complex regulatory landscapes and deal with different international trade rules across different regions. This adds complexity, potentially increases costs, and can influence how companies position themselves competitively.
7 Surprising Factors Influencing GDP PPP Per Capita Rankings in 2024 - Cryptocurrency Adoption Alters Financial Flows and GDP Calculations
The expanding use of cryptocurrencies is altering how money moves around and how we measure a country's economic output (GDP). People and businesses are increasingly embracing digital currencies, seeking greater control over their finances and a way to potentially protect against inflation. This shift in financial behavior is particularly noticeable in areas such as Central and Southern Asia, highlighting the interaction of new technologies and traditional economic measurements. However, most governments still view cryptocurrencies as speculative investments rather than real currencies, making it difficult to incorporate them into official GDP figures. The rise in cryptocurrency use demands a fresh look at how we calculate economic growth. The increasing reliance on these digital currencies could influence financial patterns and potentially conceal the true state of a country's economy. We may need new ways to evaluate economic health as the financial world becomes more digitized.
The increasing use of cryptocurrencies is causing changes in how money moves and how we calculate a country's economic output, or GDP. Many cryptocurrency transactions happen outside of traditional financial systems, which makes it hard to get an accurate picture of how much economic activity is really going on. This can lead to underreported GDP because many transactions are not recorded in traditional ways.
Cryptocurrencies make it easy to send money across borders very quickly, which impacts how money flows between countries and can cause currency values to change rapidly. This volatility makes it tough to accurately reflect the value of trade in GDP calculations.
Governments that create clear rules around cryptocurrencies can attract investment into their country, boosting GDP. But countries that are slow to adapt may see money leave for other countries with better rules, negatively affecting their economic growth.
The growth of decentralized finance (DeFi) offers people access to financial services without going through banks. This can throw off GDP calculations that rely on the traditional banking system, making it harder to understand the economy accurately.
In some areas, cryptocurrencies are becoming a primary way to buy and sell things. This is leading to new economic patterns, known as "crypto-economics," that are very different from traditional businesses. These new economic activities are fundamentally shifting the types of transactions that impact a country's GDP.
Taxing cryptocurrency profits is becoming a big part of how governments collect revenue. If they don't do a good job of including these new sources of income, national income and GDP might be underrepresented.
When people send money back to their families in other countries through cryptocurrencies, the transfer often doesn't get recorded using traditional methods. This matters because remittance flows are usually part of a country's GDP calculation.
Some countries are experimenting with government-backed digital currencies, or CBDCs, that could change how money works and influence economic stability. These new types of money could improve tracking of economic activity and lead to more accurate GDP calculations.
The value of cryptocurrencies can change a lot, causing uncertainty in the economy and perhaps leading to people investing less in traditional areas. This new level of risk could destabilize some established sectors and influence national productivity, which is tied to GDP.
Countries like El Salvador, which have made Bitcoin a legal form of money, are forcing us to rethink how we calculate GDP. This experiment raises doubts about the long-held assumptions we've had about how economies work because governments need to figure out how to track new ways of making and exchanging value.
7 Surprising Factors Influencing GDP PPP Per Capita Rankings in 2024 - Aging Populations in Developed Countries Affect Labor Markets
The aging populations in developed nations are having a notable impact on their labor markets, a key factor influencing their economic outlook. The proportion of individuals aged 65 and older is expected to rise substantially in the coming decades, placing greater pressure on the workforce and social security systems. This shift in demographics raises concerns about a potential shortage of skilled workers as the retirement age remains relatively unchanged while life expectancy increases. While older individuals are extending their working lives in some cases, the general trend towards an older workforce has the potential to curb economic growth. There is an increased need for countries to adjust their policies related to labor and social support, ensuring a sustainable workforce and managing the risks associated with supporting a growing elderly population. Adapting to this trend, effectively leveraging the skills of older workers while implementing sustainable retirement funding structures, is crucial for maintaining economic vitality in developed nations.
Developed countries are facing a demographic shift towards older populations, which has profound implications for their labor markets and, consequently, their economic performance. By 2030, individuals aged 65 and older are projected to constitute a larger portion of the population in these countries, a trend that's expected to continue through 2050. This means the ratio of working-age people to retirees is declining, leading to a tighter labor market and potentially a greater challenge in keeping people employed as they get older.
Looking at historical data from the European Union, we can see that people were leaving the workforce at an average age of 61.4, while life expectancy was already 79 years in 2009. With life expectancy projected to continue to increase in the coming decades, this imbalance between work life and lifespan is likely to put more pressure on social security systems, especially if retirement ages don't change.
This dynamic isn't just a European problem; many developed countries face similar circumstances. Increased pressure on labor markets is evident in the rising old-age dependency ratio, which compares the number of elderly people to the size of the working population. This trend indicates that a smaller pool of workers will have to support a larger group of retirees, placing a potential strain on economic growth.
Interestingly, an aging population can, in some ways, be good for economic growth as businesses may invest more in innovation and automation to counteract workforce reductions. Although this can create positive change for those businesses, it also changes the kinds of work available.
While some aspects of aging populations seem to foster economic productivity growth, there are other impacts that can negatively influence GDP. One of the significant challenges is the rising cost of healthcare. With an older population, the demand for health services increases, straining national healthcare budgets and potentially diverting resources from other areas of the economy that contribute to GDP per capita. This can become a significant drain on resources and is something policymakers will need to address in the years ahead.
Another element to consider is how consumer preferences shift. Older populations often have different spending patterns and priorities compared to younger people. Businesses must adapt to these changes by tailoring products and services to this growing demographic. Changes in spending patterns can alter the landscape of various sectors, with sectors like healthcare and hospitality likely benefiting. However, it's still an ongoing challenge to ensure that other economic areas don't lose ground to meet the needs of an older population.
These trends can also increase the dependency ratio, which looks at the balance of people who aren't part of the workforce to the size of the workforce. A larger dependency ratio can negatively impact economic growth, further complicating the way we estimate GDP.
The need for better elder care has sparked creativity in areas like telemedicine and home monitoring technologies. The emergence of these types of technologies can create new business opportunities, but there are integration and regulatory hurdles when introducing these types of products into existing healthcare infrastructures.
Flexibility in the workplace is likely to become more common to accommodate older workers, who may desire or need different types of work opportunities, like remote or part-time jobs. While this may create more work flexibility, it could lead to new concerns related to overall productivity and the types of work available.
There are also concerns that workers in older generations may lack the digital and technical skills in demand in today’s economy. Addressing this requires considerable investment in training and education initiatives, adding another potential economic burden and a challenge to fostering labor productivity.
In response to labor shortages, countries may promote immigration to attract younger workers. While this could be an effective approach to manage labor demands, it can introduce social and cultural changes that have to be addressed within a country’s infrastructure.
Finally, as the population ages, social security systems will need to adapt to address the increase in demand for retirement benefits. Changes in pension systems and the way that retirement funding is allocated can significantly alter the way governments allocate funding to different public services and also affect regional and national economic growth.
It's important to emphasize that the effects of aging populations vary across different developed countries. Each country has unique economic and social characteristics that influence how they cope with these challenges. Understanding these varying impacts and actively developing strategies to address the changing labor dynamics, healthcare burdens, and public services is crucial for maintaining and improving GDP PPP per capita. While there are economic implications that need to be understood, the future of developed economies will likely be influenced by how they adapt to support an increasingly older population.
7 Surprising Factors Influencing GDP PPP Per Capita Rankings in 2024 - Rise of Remote Work Changes Economic Geography
The increasing adoption of remote work is fundamentally altering the economic landscape, particularly how wealth and opportunity are distributed geographically. The shift away from traditional urban centers, fueled by the pandemic's acceleration of remote work practices, is impacting long-held economic growth patterns. People are choosing to live outside of big cities, leading to changes in housing demand and creating a dynamic where the gap between urban and suburban housing prices is narrowing. This population shift is affecting how money is spent and the types of jobs available in certain regions. It's also becoming clear that the nature of work itself is influencing how cities and regions develop economically. The specialization of certain locations in remote-work compatible jobs has led to a variety of impacts, some positive and some negative, which is creating a divide in economic opportunity and the types of economic development occurring in different places. Ultimately, this change to the way we work presents a set of new challenges and opportunities related to economic inequality and regional prosperity that will require monitoring and careful attention in the future.
The surge in remote work, fueled by the pandemic, has profoundly altered how people work and where they live, leading to notable changes in economic geography. The shift away from traditional urban centers towards suburban and even rural areas has become increasingly evident, as professionals prioritize factors like quality of life and affordability, creating new economic dynamics in these regions.
A noticeable trend is the increased spending by remote workers within their newfound communities. As individuals choose to live in previously less-populated areas, their spending on housing, goods, and services directly supports local businesses, effectively boosting local economies and creating ripple effects through the region. While this is generally a positive development, there are potential downsides as well. For example, increased demand on infrastructure and services might not be adequately addressed by local governments or communities.
Interestingly, the flexibility and potential for increased productivity offered by remote work arrangements appear to have positive impacts on companies and their employees. Some studies have shown productivity increases of up to 13%, which could potentially alter how we calculate regional GDP, if remote workers are more productive in different locations. However, it's important to note that the extent and long-term impacts of productivity gains with remote work aren't completely understood.
The rise of remote work has also placed a significant burden on governments to improve their digital infrastructure, particularly in areas that have recently become more popular. Inadequate internet access or reliability in remote work locations can hinder the flow of information, economic activities, and negatively impact productivity. This underscores the importance of reliable and accessible digital infrastructure for supporting these newly attractive locations for remote workers.
A majority of individuals employed within the technology industry now favor hybrid or fully remote work arrangements. This preference has significant implications for the workforce, as competition for talent in these fields intensifies, and may shift industry dynamics and regional economic performance. Competition for qualified workers can also lead to rapid inflation in certain segments of the economy, which may lead to unforeseen consequences.
The changing work dynamics have also fostered a burgeoning landscape for freelancers and entrepreneurs. This increasing participation in new business models is altering localized economic activities in ways that were largely unforeseen during pre-pandemic eras. While this is a positive development for some workers and sectors, it also may create further challenges related to economic disparity and equity as some communities or demographics struggle to adapt to these changes.
Furthermore, the rise of remote work has significantly contributed to the so-called "Great Resignation," where many employees are reassessing their career paths and priorities. This phenomenon has the potential to lead to talent shortages, particularly in urban areas, impacting their overall GDP because of a reduced labor pool. However, the long-term impacts of the "Great Resignation" are still not clear, and the dynamics of this phenomenon continue to shift rapidly.
Companies are also adapting their business models and infrastructure to incorporate remote work practices. There has been a wave of redesign and changes in commercial real estate, specifically in urban areas, which are attempting to incorporate a more flexible and dynamic office structure. How this change will affect local businesses and economies is still largely unknown.
However, remote work has also exacerbated disparities in digital literacy across demographic groups. The gap in digital skills between different populations could hinder overall economic productivity and growth, potentially creating social and economic challenges. This is a complex issue, and we need to better understand the implications of these gaps to develop strategies for mitigation.
The expanding adoption of remote work has led to a greater reliance on digital payment systems and online platforms for commerce. This shift is transforming the way economic activity is tracked and measured, posing challenges to traditional GDP assessments. As this trend continues, we'll need to develop new tools and methods to accurately and effectively measure the impacts on the global economy.
In summary, the evolution of remote work has created a fundamental shift in economic geography, influencing economic activity, and GDP calculations. The long-term consequences of this shift are still being revealed, and it's crucial to monitor and understand these changes to develop policies that support and address the evolving economic landscape in a way that benefits the broadest segments of the economy and society.
7 Surprising Factors Influencing GDP PPP Per Capita Rankings in 2024 - Geopolitical Tensions Influence Trade Patterns and Economic Performance
Geopolitical tensions are reshaping global trade and impacting economic performance in significant ways. The current environment of international relations is marked by increasing complexity, with major trade relationships like the US and China experiencing shifts and challenges. This complexity disrupts traditional trade patterns and leads to uncertainty in global supply chains. Political instability, trade disputes, and regional conflicts continue to disrupt these flows and significantly impact economic decisions and diplomacy. Businesses, especially those involved in international trade, face increased operational challenges as a result of these geopolitical shifts. They need to be more nimble and better understand and manage risk. This environment makes understanding the intricate relationship between global politics and economics crucial for nations and their economies to thrive in 2024.
Geopolitical tensions are increasingly shaping the global economic landscape, significantly impacting trade patterns and economic growth. The past decade has seen a rise in trade disputes, technological rivalries, and heightened geopolitical risks, all of which have redefined how nations interact economically. One notable example is the US-China trade dispute, where concerns over technological dominance and evolving geopolitical alliances have fundamentally changed global trade flows.
Looking ahead to 2024, it seems likely that geopolitical instability, trade conflicts, and regional disputes will continue to disrupt global supply chains. Trade is not evenly distributed across countries, and only a small number of nations, including major economic powers like the EU, China, and the US, are responsible for the largest shares of global imports in relation to countries like Switzerland. This concentration of trade flows highlights the importance of relationships between key nations.
A country's location and geography play a critical role in shaping its trade patterns and overall geopolitical standing. Proximity to markets, access to resources, and navigable waterways all factor into a country's ability to participate in global trade and exert influence on the global stage. Geopolitical disputes frequently arise from conflicts over geographic boundaries or access to strategically important areas, with significant consequences for international economic relations.
International trade is directly impacted by political tensions and trade disputes, as countries use economic policy and diplomacy to navigate these challenges. This can range from trade tensions and tariff disputes to broader sanctions, all of which can change trade flows and the economic outlook for countries.
Businesses are facing unprecedented challenges due to these shifts in the global political arena. Those heavily involved in international trade need to carefully reconsider their operational strategies and risk management plans, especially with the rapid evolution of geopolitical events. It's interesting to consider the impact of these conflicts on trade growth and innovation. While conventional trade models suggest that the economic costs of conflicts are relatively small, it's unclear how this may change in the future.
The relationship between economic and political factors is clearly intertwined, as seen during the US-China trade dispute, which resulted in significant fluctuations in global markets. The interconnected nature of the global economy and geopolitical dynamics makes it difficult to isolate the impact of one factor from another. The continued interaction of politics and economics is likely to drive shifts in the global economic landscape for the foreseeable future.
Analyze any video with AI. Uncover insights, transcripts, and more in seconds. (Get started for free)
More Posts from whatsinmy.video: